LG Cinema 3D explained at CES 2011

Posted: October 27th, 2011 | Author: admin | Filed under: Information About 3DTV | Tags: , , | 23 Comments »


George Mead takes us through the Cinema 3D technology launched by LG at CES 2011

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

23 Comments on “LG Cinema 3D explained at CES 2011”

  1. 1 vlobonita said at 10:25 am on October 27th, 2011:

    Cinema 3D TVs are great. I’ve seen 3d demos on many tvs and this is by far the best 3d tv. I saw the LW6500 model and 2d and 3d both look amazing. I can’t wait to get one for myself.

  2. 2 Capilee said at 10:44 am on October 27th, 2011:

    @phadil no, these are 60hz displays.

  3. 3 786masakeens said at 11:30 am on October 27th, 2011:

    Hi, Ive got one of these cinima tvs, i was wondering if i need to suscribe to sky or do i just need a hd set up box as far as i know converts from 2d to 3d, please help!!

  4. 4 phadil said at 12:00 pm on October 27th, 2011:

    Can i use this TV in conjuction with Nvidia 3D Vision?

  5. 5 ChaiAngad said at 12:58 pm on October 27th, 2011:

    @REXXBAILEY Yeah! No prob :)

  6. 6 manic221 said at 1:07 pm on October 27th, 2011:

    @fuclesh thanks for making that clear :) got my Passive set a few weeks ago really love it :) and the 3D converter on it is incredible like i can’t believe how could it is lol

  7. 7 REXXBAILEY said at 1:17 pm on October 27th, 2011:

    @ChaiAngad THANK U FOR THAT INFORMATIVE PIECE BRO .. DAT HELPS .. WELL I M A SAMSUNG FAN ACTUALLY… NOT FOR 3D THOUGH JUS NORMAL SCREENS.. BUT LG SEEMS TO BE CUTTING THROUGH ALL KINDSA NOISE AND COMING ACROSS AS A VERY CREDIBLE PRODUCT IN ERVYWAY AND ALL.. SO DATS WHY RECENTLY TOOK NOTICE OF IT AND STUFF.. ANYWAYS THANKS FOR DAT PIECE OF WISDOM DUDE..

  8. 8 giantiger12 said at 1:49 pm on October 27th, 2011:

    I saw a lg cinema 3d tv at best buy.. WOW! It was outstanding! Much much better than sony’s 3d and samsung’s 3d….

  9. 9 ChaiAngad said at 2:15 pm on October 27th, 2011:

    @REXXBAILEY Depends… If u want a stylish and edgeless glossy screen go for Samsung.
    I must say tht if 3D picture quality is important to u then u must go for LG.
    but if normal 2D picture Samsung may be a little better than the LG.

    I too had long time deciding between LG and Samsung. But at the end I think i’ll go for the LG cinema 3D
    because I dont want headaches and I dont want to hurt my eyes with Shutter glasses.
    and about the smart function they are similar, but I love how LG remote is.

  10. 10 REXXBAILEY said at 2:25 pm on October 27th, 2011:

    WHICH ONES BETTER AMONG THE TWO.. LG OR SAMSUNG??…

  11. 11 fuclesh said at 2:46 pm on October 27th, 2011:

    @manic221 Passive have little to no flicker and glasses are cheaper.
    the only downside to passive is that the rrsolution is Half as much as Active PER EYE.
    but since both eyes would be getting 540p they would add up to 1080p and as the brain recieves the collective vision of both eyes your still going to be watching 1080p only.

  12. 12 manic221 said at 2:58 pm on October 27th, 2011:

    Getting the 32 inch cinema 3D TV in a couple of weeks I checked it out today and honestly I don’t see a different between active and passive if anything the passive TV I looked at today looked far superior to the top of the range Samsung and Panasonic TV’s I’ve recently checked, honestly I think Passive is the way forward.

  13. 13 catalino1977 said at 3:13 pm on October 27th, 2011:

    just buy my new LG 42″ LW4500 with 7 glasses for free

  14. 14 catalino1977 said at 3:13 pm on October 27th, 2011:

    i just buy my new LG 42″ LW4500 with 7 3D glasses for FREE for the cost of 979€

  15. 15 jordler said at 3:17 pm on October 27th, 2011:

    i heard you lose half the resolution with this

  16. 16 OtomoTenzi said at 4:17 pm on October 27th, 2011:

    LG = Low Grade, Lotsa Glare, Life’s Garbage.

    Any questions?

  17. 17 CocksRobert said at 5:05 pm on October 27th, 2011:

    Had the LG demo last week, first to see it in Australia. AWSOME! no flicker no headache $1 per set of glasses, 20 of us watching all over the room. Glasses cost $20 Active would have cost $2000. Look up the new LG magic wand for surfing internet on the TV, use it just like a wee remote. :) score 1 for LG.

  18. 18 CocksRobert said at 5:20 pm on October 27th, 2011:

    Had the LG demo last week, first to see it in Australia. AWSOME! no flicker no headache $1 per set of glasses, 20 of us watching all over the room. Glasses cost $20 Active would have cost $2000. Look up the new LG magic wand for surfing internet on the TV, use it just like a wee remote. :) score 1 for LG.

  19. 19 CocksRobert said at 6:08 pm on October 27th, 2011:

    LG Cinemaaaaaaaa

  20. 20 ChrisZaney said at 7:03 pm on October 27th, 2011:

    I hope LG doesn’t go the way of Samsung and Sony and release these highly glossy non-matte screens which are a complete disaster, they look pretty in showrooms but in a living room the reflections are horrible.

  21. 21 oknitro said at 7:38 pm on October 27th, 2011:

    10% can’t see with 3d glasses? Now they can see with naked eye? What? You still need glasses. They just don’t charge and sync is all.

  22. 22 eduardo00178 said at 7:56 pm on October 27th, 2011:

    This great because 10% of the people in the world can´t see anything with those 3D glasses, now they can see with the naked eye.

  23. 23 Flyingheart111 said at 8:23 pm on October 27th, 2011:

    great vid you guys!

Leave a Reply